New York Lawyer Advertisement:
A New York Law Journal publication

Home | Classified Ads | Message Boards

Search

Advanced Search
Law Firms
Associate Pay & Layoffs
Double Billing
Law Firm
Recruiting Guide
Law Firms A to Z
The NYLJ 100
The AmLaw Midlevel
Associates Survey
New Partners
Beyond Firms
Best Legal Web Sites
Law 101
Passing the Bar Exam
WTC Attack
NYLJ Fiction Contest
Get Advice
Advice for the Lawlorn
Crossroads
Message Boards
Work/Life Wisdom
Services
Contact Us
Corrections
Make Us Your
Home Page
Shop American
Lawyer Media
This Week's
Public Notices
Today's Classified Ads
Who We Are
 
 
News Watch

NY Law Leaves 9/11 Survivors Competing For Benefits

New York Lawyer
October 21, 2004

By Mark Fass
New York Law Journal

The pending appeal of a Workers' Compensation Board ruling pits the children of victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks against the victims' fiancees and domestic partners.

At issue is §4 of New York's Workers' Compensation Law, a provision that affords the domestic partners of the Sept. 11 victims the same rights as surviving spouses.

The law places domestic partners in direct competition with the victims' children for Workers' Compensation benefits, according to the appellant's brief submitted by Robert Grey to the Appellate Division, Third Department in August. Reply papers from the New York Attorney General's Office are due Nov. 8.

In passing the law, state legislators believed it would only be relevant for gay partnerships, said Mr. Grey of Grey & Grey in Farmingdale.

"They had no clue that heterosexual people that had children by one marriage and lived with a boyfriend or girlfriend would qualify under this statute," he said. Therefore, the law failed to address issues involving remarriage and children, and domestic partners' benefits came into direct competition with surviving children's benefits, Mr. Grey said.

Mr. Grey represents the daughter of Paul Innella, a systems analyst who was among the 658 Cantor Fitzgerald employees killed at the World Trade Center. In addition to his daughter, Victoria, his survivors included his ex-wife, Victoria's mother; and his fiancee, Lucy Aita.

On July 18, 2002, the Workers' Compensation Board issued an administrative decision awarding Victoria the maximum death benefits, a weekly award of $400 plus a retroactive payment of $17,360.

Five days later, Ms. Aita filed an appeal of the decision that resulted in reducing Victoria's weekly award from $400 to $180. The same ruling awarded Ms. Aita $220 per week.

The appellant's brief argues, among other things, that the provision for domestic partners denies equal protection of the law to the children of Sept. 11 victims.

Link to: The full story
Subscription to nylj.com required.


 

TRIAL ATTORNEY
especially Kings,NY &.
3 furnished
windowed offices



© 2004 NLP IP Company
Terms of Use and Privacy Policy