WORLD | UTAH | BUSINESS | SPORTS | OPINION | LIFESTYLE | CLASSIFIEDS
FRIDAY
April 16, 2004
Quick Search
Commentary
Columnists
Commentary
Public Forum
Utah Politics
Online Poll
Bagley Gallery
 How to submit a public forum letter:

Mail:
  Public Forum
  Salt Lake Tribune
  P.O.Box 867
  Salt Lake City,
  Utah 84111

E-mail: letters@sltrib.com (NO attachments)

Fax: 801-257-8950

Click for guidelines, tips and how to submit editorials...
News
Contents
Past Editions
Weather
Utah Politics
Obituaries
Archives
Today's Page 1
Sports
Jazz
Grizzlies
BYU Cougars
Utah Utes
Preps
Ski Report
Features
Film Finder
Arts
Travel
Food
Outdoors
Health & Science
Faith
Shopping
Classifieds
Retail Ads Online
Special Sections
Cars/RVs
Real Estate
Jobs
Education Guide
Utah Bride Guide
Utah City Guide
Grocery Guru
Fantasy Sports
Advertising Info
Bus./Industry
Extras
Not In Print
Online Poll
N.I.E.
Mobile Editions
Reader Panel
Crossword
Services
Help Desk
FAQ
Search
Subscribe
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
Sowell: 9-11 commission collecting ammunition for Election Day


Thomas Sowell
SYNDICATED COLUMNIST


    The so-called 9-11 commission is supposedly trying to find out what happened, or failed to happen, that allowed the terrorist attack of 9-11 to succeed. But there is a big difference between trying to unearth facts about Sept. 11, 2001, and trying to collect political ammunition for Nov. 2, 2004 -- Election Day.
    It has become painfully obvious from some commission members' grandstanding, especially during their questioning of national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, that they are more interested in scoring political points during an election year than in finding out what happened before the terrorist attacks in 2001.
    Many of what were presented to Rice as questions were really political speeches -- and the fact that the questioners tried to keep her from replying to their insinuations showed how little interest they had in finding out facts.
    After all, Condoleezza Rice had already testified for hours before this same commission in private, so calling her back to testify again before television cameras was pure politics.
    The underlying assumption that an unprecedented surprise attack could succeed only if there was an intelligence failure is one of the signs of the lack of realism in our times. During World War II, the American government knew that the Japanese were likely to attack us somewhere, somehow, during the last months of 1941 -- but that was wholly different from knowing that they were going to bomb Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7.
    To some today, the fact that the Bush administration had warnings that al-Qaida was up to something should have told them that terrorists were going to fly planes into the World Trade Center on Sept. 11.
    We already know from Osama bin Laden himself that not even all the terrorists on the hijacked planes that flew into the World Trade Center knew that this was what those in the cockpit were going to do. If hijackers on board the planes didn't know, how could anyone else know?
    The same people who have been criticizing our Homeland Security's generalized warnings and alerts seem to think that generalized information before Sept. 11 should have let the administration know what specifically the terrorists were going to do and when and how they were going to do it.

Advertisement


    Commission member and former Sen. Bob Kerrey argued that President Bush had enough information on the terrorist networks before Sept. 11 to ask Congress for a declaration of war on them.
    Put aside the fact that this commission is supposed to be finding out what actually happened, not drawing up plays like Monday morning quarterbacks. Can you imagine what would have happened if President Bush had done what Bob Kerrey suggested?
    Suppose the president had somehow managed to get the closely divided Congress to issue a declaration of war against terrorist networks prior to 9-11 and then 9-11 happened. You know and I know that the president's declaration of war would have been blamed for the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
    Loud cries would be ringing out across the land that this would never have happened except for President Bush's declaration of war. You can just hear the words and the music.
    All this political grandstanding is taking place in the shadow of the greatest danger our nation has ever faced. North Korea is not only rebuilding its nuclear capacity, it is a threat to sell nuclear weapons to terrorist organizations, including those who planned the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
    Make no mistake about it. We could wake up some morning and find American cities in smoldering radioactive ruins.
    Against this background, partisan political grandstanding is obscene. It is as if officers on the Titanic were spending their time arguing among themselves about who should have seen the iceberg, instead of getting people into lifeboats.
    We already know that our enemies are following American political bickering. Sen. John Kerry's political statements are being reported extensively in North Korea's government-controlled press. The North Korean regime is no doubt among the foreign supporters who want him to win this year's election.
   -----
    Creators Syndicate Inc.
   
   

© Copyright 2004, The Salt Lake Tribune.
All material found on Utah Online is copyrighted The Salt Lake Tribune and associated news services. No material may be reproduced or reused without explicit permission from The Salt Lake Tribune.


Front Page | Contents | Search | World/Nation | Utah | Business | Sports | Editorials | Public Forum Letters | Commentary | Lifestyle | Movies | Travel | Science | Religion | Archives | Weather | Obituaries

Mobile Editions | Columnists | Online Poll | Utah Politics | 2002 Olympics |
Contact Us | FAQ | Privacy Policy | Print Subscriptions | Reader Panel | Newspapers In Education

webmaster@sltrib.com